Updates to Cataloguing FAQs regarding z39.50 and record matching.

Signed-off-by: Jennifer Pringle <jennifer.pringle@bc.libraries.coop>

diff --git a/policy/policy-cat.xml b/policy/policy-cat.xml
index 345ce5d..7970d95 100644 (file)
--- a/policy/policy-cat.xml
+++ b/policy/policy-cat.xml
@@ -884,11 +884,10 @@ For a list of content terms for 336$a,
                     <para>How do I request more Z39.50 targets to be added to Evergreen?</para>\r
                 </question>\r
                 <answer>\r
-                    <para>In order to ensure that Z39.50 targets meet the standards designated for a\r
-                        “best” record, the Cataloguing Working Group will review all requests before\r
-                        recommending addition to Sitka. Member libraries should submit their Z39.50\r
-                        target requests to Sitka Support, who will forward them to the Cataloguing\r
-                        Working Group for review.</para>\r
+                    <para>Send a request to \r
+                                       <link xlink:href="https://bc.libraries.coop/request-support/">Support</link>. Support assesses potential\r
+                                       sources based on perceived need by Sitka libraries and quality of records.</para>\r
+                                       <para>Please note, not all organizations provide Z39.50 access to their database.</para>\r
                 </answer>\r
             </qandaentry>\r
             <qandaentry>\r
@@ -956,6 +955,9 @@ holds placed on the copy will be filled.</para>
                         to add an edition statement in parentheses to the 020 -ISBN field, e.g.\r
                         paperback, library binding, etc. if different from the bibliographic\r
                         record’s edition statement.</para>\r
+                                               \r
+                                               <para>Records for physical items are never considered to be a match for an e-resource and\r
+                                               vice versus.  The ISBN for an e-book should not be added as a 020 field on a record for a physical book.</para>\r
                 </answer>\r
             </qandaentry>\r
             <qandaentry>\r